Social Work Supervision Theory Series: Contextual Approach (Article 3)


The National Association of Social Workers, Best Practices in Social Work Supervision guidelines (2013) suggests that supervisors who are providing supervision services to those seeking clinical licensure be familiar with Supervision Theory. Over the past three weeks this blog has been exploring Social Work Supervision Theory. This week’s article will focus on the Contextual Approach to Social Work supervision. Before delving too deeply into this theory it is important to note that the way a supervisor would utilize theory differs slightly based on how the supervision is being provided. For example, if supervision is happening within a workplace setting, versus a private pay arrangement. For reference ease, supervision within the workplace will be called “Managerial Supervision,” and supervision pursued outside the workplace in a private pay environment will be called “Advisory Supervision” throughout the course of this article.   

Contextual Approach
Contextual Approach to Social Work supervision was developed by Ming-Sum Tsui in 2005 and can be best described as a marriage of multiple supervision theories. What differentiates it is that it considers context in the supervision process. Context in regard to this theory is identified as the cultural, physical, and psychological/interpersonal environment in which a supervision session takes place. To break it down even further, this theory understands that supervision does not happen inside a bubble, but rather in relation to situations happening around the session.

For the purpose of this theory, cultural elements considered to be the social attitudes in the community in which the supervisee works. Physical elements implied in this theory include the literal physical space where the supervision occurs. And psychological/interpersonal environments are the attitudes and emotions that the supervisor and supervisee each bring into the session.

In addition to these contextual elements, this theory also consists of three major components: 1.   Supervision Contract which is necessary to understanding the rights and responsibilities of both the supervisor and supervisee and can include: meeting times, goals, expectations and tasks; 2.      Format, which is the when and how supervision is to occur; 3. Stage/Development, which is the literal age of the supervisory relationship (i.e. is the relationship brand new vs. long established).

Another differentiating factor of this theory, and what makes it perhaps the best suited of the three theories discussed in this series for advisory supervision, is that Tsui considers the Supportive role of supervision to be the most important function of supervision. Though he concedes that the major objective of supervision is to monitor supervisee job function.

Here are some examples of how the Contextual Approach could be used during Social Work Supervision:

Uses in Managerial Supervision:  Doria works for an agency that provides after school activities to inner city children. Doria has been able to receive supervision from her direct supervisor Cameron for the past year (Stage/Development). Doria and Cameron have agreed to meet once weekly in Cameron’s office (Supervision Contract/Format) where they discuss cases she may be working. Doria and Cameron frequently discuss the struggles their agency is going though including lack of funding, and the state of their agency’s building (cultural/physical environments). Doria often shares her concerns regarding the frequent turnover of staff which results in an increased workload for her and feelings of burnout (psychological/interpersonal environments). Cameron provides Doria with supportive listening and suggestions for how she can organize her caseload. Doria feels supported by Cameron and despite her frequent feelings of being overwhelmed has no plans to leave her agency.

Uses in Advisory Supervision: Carol has been a Social Worker for five years in a hospital setting and has goals to obtain her clinical level licensure, however there are no clinically licensed Social Workers currently working in her hospital as there is no position in the hospital requiring this credential (Cultural Environment). Carol recently got the name of a supervisor, Rachel, from a colleague who used to work with Rachel in a similar medical environment. Carol has reached out to Rachel and they recently met for their first supervision session (Stage/Development) in a local room at a public library (physical environment). Rachel and Carol discussed the supervision contract and expectations regarding preparation for each session (Supervision Contract/Format). During their initial discussion the pair shared that they both have young children and may have to cancel their sessions at a moments notice if their children are in need (psychological/interpersonal environments) both are comfortable with this arrangement. Because of their similar work backgrounds and stage of life Carol feels that Rachel will be able to provide her with a great deal of support.

Each of the three theories discussed in these articles overlap in some way, and can ultimately be argued to be useful in both managerial and advisory supervision settings. The core purpose of all of these methodologies is to ensure that a supervisor is considering the holistic experience of supervision. Therefore, being familiar with each of these theories allows the supervisor to customize the supervision experience for each supervisee. If interested in the two other Supervision Theories discussed in this blog series please visit our blog: besupervised@blogspot.com.

What are your thoughts on these theories? Do you use any other theories in your supervision work?

Please leave a comment and let us know your thoughts on this article. If you liked what you read please like our blog, besupervised@blogspot.com, or follow us on Facebook (@LISWSupervision), or on LinkedIn at Be Supervised.
           
Sources for this Article

Britton, C. & Potter, C. (2009) Child Welfare Supervision; A Practical Guide for Supervisors, Managers, and Administrators. Published by Oxford University Press.

Interactional Supervisory Competencies. (Retrieved 8/9/2018). Center for Social Work Supervision and Consultancy, http://cswsc.co.uk/

National Association of Social Workers, Best Practices in Social Work Supervision (2013) https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=GBrLbl4BuwI%3D&portalid=0. Retrieved 7/31/2018.

Comments